Life and death cycle of information

Comments

[this is good]

I like the concept ... it flies against the story that larger vendors have been campaigning for years to have one version of the storage and then desperately deal with the performance!

Here the concerns are clearly seperated, but using Search as the consolidated access paradigm, you are able to still bring the information together when needed.

I would only caution that it may sound too much of a generalization and it may be applicable for specific use cases which can be elaborated.

I like this concept... one real life application.....

Stock tick data...

when trading through the day .. we dont need year old data.. usually.. a good one month
data is more than enough...

But when analyzing in the evening (sometimes during the day too) .. we need to pull all our data and then do the
Analysis… this can mean data worth years…..

The present solution is we maintain 2 databases .. One with tick data for trading… and another with
EOD data for analysis later…..
But this does gets irritating at time.. Keep on switching database…. It takes time…

But if this onedata .. Keeps all the data at one database (dead and alive parts) .. Then I don’t need to switch database…
And also I can keep tick data for years….and pulls as per my request…..

Good idea…:)

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in